Uncategorized

L298N etc

Retrofit Motorised/Heated Seats in a Restoration Project [closed]

Ask QuestionAsked todayActive todayViewed 17 times1Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.


Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.

Closed 6 mins ago.Improve this question

Hoping to get some direction from those wiser than me.

I’ve installed a driver and passenger seat from a W203 E55 AMG Mercedes in my 1991 Toyota LC80 and can’t help but think my controller design is probably cave-man’esque and with the advice of a guru, there is a solution that is more efficient.

These are not the exact seats but an image I found online of the same model:

W203 E55 Seats

Each seat contains 5 DC motors and two heaters, I have a copy of the relevant Mercedes factory service manual which holds all the necessary schematics and have tried to keep the naming convention similar.

Left Seat
LRFA = Left Rail Fore/Aft
LRUD = Left Rear Up/Down
LFUD = Left Front Up/Down
LHUD = Left Head Restraint Up/Down
LBFA = Left Backrest Fore/Aft

LSHC = Left Seat Heated Cushion
LBHC= Left Backrest Heated Cushion

Right Seat
RRFA = Right Rail Fore/Aft
RRUD = Right Rear Up/Down
RFUD = Right Front Up/Down
RHUD = Right Head Restraint Up/Down
RBFA = Right Backrest Fore/Aft

RSHC = Right Seat Heated Cushion
RBHC= Right Backrest Heated Cushion

Tested all the motors and they work as expected. At 12V the motors come in around 10-15 A depending on position. When initially testing with an L298N, I realised they would drag far more current than I could test with ‘cheapy’ drivers so just wired up a 2 relay forward-backward switch directly from a small 12V battery.

Ideally hardware would be less than 5 rocker switches and 10 relays per seat for motion control.

My thinking is:

  1. Rotary Encoder per seat to control motor selection and heater intensity.
  2. Pressing the encoder in as a button will change between seat heating and motor selection.
  3. Rocker switch per seat to control forward/reverse when motor is selected.

MOTOR CONTROL: Rotary encoder to switch between the 5 motors by moving CW/CCW Perhaps 5 LEDs or similar around the knob to illustrate current selection Single Rocker switch for FWD / OPEN / REVERSE 16-Channel 12V Relay Module (see attached) Adruino Nano or similar to communicate between the rotary selection knob and the relays.

HEATER CONTROL: Run both the seat and backrest heaters in parallel, I don’t see any situation where one but not the other will be required. Using the same rotary encoder and 5 LEDs around the knob for 5 positions of intensity 20/40/60/80/100% heat intensity via PWM signal to a KSJ30 SSR (see attached)

So my questions to the brains trust is – Do you see any issues with my thinking? Is there any other method of control you would suggest? I was thinking of an FPGA given the nature of the outputs but think it might be easier for me as a newby to stick to an IDE that has loads of online assistance around it.

Can you think of any other efficient ways to control the motors and heaters? I was even thinking of ditching the rocker switch and using the push button function on the encoder to be a ‘select’ of sorts then CW/CCW moves the selected motor FWD/REV but the programming path seemed a bit out of my depth at this stage.

Thanks for taking the time to read and potentially help,
Callummicrocontrollerarduinodc-motormotor-controllerelectro-mechanicalShareEditFollowFlagasked 44 mins agoCallum1 New contributor

  • 1That should be fun and neet when finished, let us know how it goes. You are correct it takes a lot of relays, that is why automotive switched to MOSFETs. Take a look at a Siemens BTS7960, It will do the job. A full bridge with heatsink etc ready for 5V logic is available at many places. I found this one Double BTS7960 43A H-bridge High-power Motor Driver module for about $5 including shipping. Here is the link: aliexpress.com/item/… You will need one per motor. I use them for LED drivers they are great and run cold. – Gil 14 mins ago 
  • Yes, L298N is not efficient. Perhaps you can try BTN7971B. See References’ Part C of my answer to the following Q&A: DC motor speed control – EESE: electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/510755/…. Cheers. – tlfong01 13 mins ago    

add a comment

Categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.